Let’s
imagine that there is an issue in the national news that could possibly benefit
from legislation. The issue gets brought to a vote in an equally divided
House or Senate, and it is defeated by a tie vote exactly 50% to 50%.
Democrats vote one way, republicans vote the other. (Of course, the
impasse is more severe in the Senate because many issues require a 60-40
supermajority to move forward.)
Is
that how people really are? Is that how they really think? Every
politician agrees exactly with their party’s position? I don’t think
so. I imagine that individual positions, without the benefit of party
politics, would be more like bell curves; the center of the bell curve being at
least slightly off-center one way or the other for each party; and there would
be some overlap. Some republicans would agree with the democratic
position and some democrats would agree with the republican position.
Each person left to their own conscience, a majority of the votes would fall
one way or the other. If something needed to get done, or undone, it could
happen.
What
a marvel of politics is the two-party system! Absolute adherence to the
party line stalling any change, even when the general public, the public these
politicians purport to represent, would applaud a particular change. How
thrilled, or horrified, would the framers of our constitution be if they could
see us now?