It’s
election night.
Two
years ago, Judy and I were camping with no access to television and went to bed
early. Tonight, we’re glued to the TV. There is a difference in
enthusiasm.
It’s
election night.
Two
years ago, Judy and I were camping with no access to television and went to bed
early. Tonight, we’re glued to the TV. There is a difference in
enthusiasm.
Why
go to all the trouble and expense to set up fish farms to harvest salmon?
They build mesh pens out in coastal water, raise the fish in them, source and
feed them food pellets, and the waste piles up on the seabed beneath them
creating dead zones.
As
an alternative, we stood at the entrance to a fish hatchery in Alaska and
watched a hundred thousand free-swimming fish crowding the river waiting for
their turn to swim up the fish ladder to where they were hatched and raised for
the first few weeks of their lives, before they swam out to sea to feed, grow,
mature, and swim right back to where they were raised, to present themselves.



Just
harvest them! Are the financial and environmental costs worth it to farm
fish in pens and take care of them all their lives while they pollute the water
they’re living in, when all you have to do instead is hatch them, turn them
loose, let them raise themselves in the open ocean, and return right to where
they were released? Seems like a simpler cleaner way to me.
I
want it to be that simple, but it’s not.
Say
you want a hundred thousand adult fish to return. For that you might have
to release ten million hatchlings. And a hundred thousand fish would not
be nearly enough to satisfy the demands of even a single cannery. The
combined canneries in Alaska alone can process a hundred million fish in a
season, a combination of hatchery and wild. Releasing enough hatchery
fish at a time to satisfy the demand could overwhelm the carrying capacity of
the local estuary. Even when they go to live and grow in the open ocean,
they don’t go to the entire ocean, they congregate at feeding grounds, competing
with the wild fish stock and depleting the food source. Releases from
multiple hatcheries from multiple countries could overwhelm the feeding
grounds.
A
local solution that seems simple, but it’s an illusion. A bigger picture
to consider, and in this case a global one, with tradeoffs.
It
took a while, but we got all the parts we needed, all the old sticky attachment
points off, and new sticky attachment points on.
To
make the magnetic window covers stick to the glass, first it looked like this.

It
worked great, the window covers stuck securely, but the look was unsettling.
Now
that we’re redone, we have strips of ½ inch magnetic tape all around the
windows. Along the top of each window, we’ve got those sticky metal tabs
for the curtain magnets to attach to stuck to the magnetic tape. With the
window covers securely attached at the top, the rest of the magnetic strips
provide enough attraction to hold the remainder of each window cover in place.
What
it looks like now with the window covers off.

And
with the window covers on.

All
set now.
In
August of 1968, Judy and me driving cross-country in our 1966 VW Bus, having
left Southern California searching for a place we’d rather be, we discovered
Colorado, a place we had never been before. And when we stopped at a
pullout on top of the hill overlooking Boulder, we were so blown away by what
we had found, a little city filled with trees, at the base of the foothills,
backdropped by the flatirons, and farther back the continental divide, we immediately
declared “We’re home”, before we had even driven down into town to find a place
to stay and begin to look for jobs. Thus began our exploration of the
wonders of Colorado. It was a magical time.
Then,
in 1972, four years later, John Denver put to words what we had
experienced. “He was born in the summer of his 27th year;
coming home to a place he’d never been before.”
Now,
just thinking back to that time in 1968, and the way it was then. Well
said, John Denver.

The
mature trunk bent to the ground, but the entire length bursting forth with new
growth.

I
think our government would be more effective, more representative, and we would
all be better off if:
All
judges and justices, including the US Supreme Court, were appointed by
independent commissions. Nonpartisan commissions, or if they can’t be
nonpartisan, fairly weighted based on party affiliation.
All
voting districts were also set by independent commissions. Nonpartisan
commissions, or if they can’t be nonpartisan, fairly weighted based on party
affiliation.
Corporations
were determined to not be people and only people could make political
contributions. Set a maximum contribution per person, and that includes
the candidate. One person, one vote, no million-dollar contributions, no
political PACs. No dark money. If that can’t provide enough money
for each candidate to present their qualifications, then provide a base level
of federal or state campaign funding for qualified candidates.
Maybe
we can’t reach the ideal of one person one vote, assuming that is still an
ideal, but these approaches might get us closer to it. And none of this
would be that hard to do, if there was a will to do it.